Abstract The purposes of research were to 1) study the development of Public Administration program (PAP), 2) study and compare students satisfaction of Administrative (PAP) 3) study and compare TQF behaviors of students 4) study teachers satisfaction of Administrative PAP and 5) study development guideline PAP. Quantitative research samples were 239 students and teachers academic year 2015 to be taken by Yamanae Taro. The tools were questionnaires rating scale and interview. The statistic used percentages, mean scores, standard deviations and independent sample ttest. The findings:1) The development of students satisfaction of Administrative were deming cycle activities, teacher development, pariticipation and education assureance. 2) Students satisfaction of Administrative PA Program were high rank follow: teacher, curicurum, advisors, support learner factors and learning evaluation. None significance of students satisfaction of Administrative PA Program diffence students gender. 3) Sudents TQF behaviors were high rank follow: ethics and moral, cognitive skills, numerical analysis, communication and information technology skills, knowledge and interpersonal skills and responsibility. None significance of TQF behaviors diffence gender. 4) satisfaction of teachers were moderate rank follow: learning and teaching, curicurum content, advisors, learning evaluation, teacher and support learner factors. 5) The development guideline PAP were teacher discipline, role model, soleven problem participation, good governmance, education assureance, cooperative education and public relation.